in the comments of heidi on my blog, she said "we will have to work on your spelling."
ok. so here is an explanation. i can't spell. i can spell better than other people (like this guy i know...i don't associate with him anymore...but he spelled tomorrow, tamorrow. and he thought that was how it was spelled.) but the fact remains that i have problems.
i know you all know that i have problems. well those of you who know me know that i know i have problems. but at least i know that you know that i know i have problems...or something like that.
so the whole point of this blog is to ask anyone if they know if there is a spell check on movable type?
Posted by hill at May 14, 2004 05:34 PMThe only reason I said we would "work on it" was because you've mentioned spelling difficulties in the past. And about spell check, I type my entries in MS Word and then paste into Moveable Type--so if there's some better method somebody better fill us in--and add add anything else. And dictionary.com. It's the best.
Posted by: heidi at May 14, 2004 06:40 PMI type my entries up in MT, copy them to Word for a spell check (if it's a long entry), fix the problems and either correct them in MT or copy the entire entry back in. Not the most efficient method, but it works.
Posted by: Jonathan at May 14, 2004 06:52 PMheidi, i hope you know that i am just kidding with you? no hard feelings???
Posted by: hill at May 14, 2004 07:10 PMi just make sure i always spell everything rite.
Posted by: dw at May 14, 2004 10:15 PMDefinitely no hard feelings. And I was kidding when I made the comment about spelling to begin with...this working together will be fun. You'll figure out pretty quickly that I'm kidding most of the time anyway. :)
Posted by: heidi at May 14, 2004 10:34 PMPlease note: Comments will not appear immediately. Your comment will appear upon approval by the blog's editor. We had to implement this to decrease the amount of spam that our site receives. Please forgive the inconvenience. We are looking into other, friendlier options.